My Take On Boston And No-Show Owners

BLACKHAND · Post by **BLACKHAND** » Mon Sep 06, 2010 12:07 pm

Originally posted by Todd Zola:
quote:Originally posted by Raiders:
'And yes, this makes the fact we did not call Greg an even more egregious omission.'

?, you told players that you spoke to Greg, is that not true? I did not talk to Greg nor did I tell anyone that I had.

Seth talked to Tom and Geoff Stein. I did not speak to anyone and never claimed that I did. [/QUOTE]todd , i told greg i would drop this. dont push it. your pissing me off. tell the truth and shame the devil.

Raiders · Post by **Raiders** » Mon Sep 06, 2010 12:07 pm

Originally posted by Quahogs:
quote:Originally posted by Raiders:
quote:Originally posted by Todd Zola:
quote:Originally posted by THE_BLACKHAND:
todd , you went off the adp in the 9th and 10th rounds to get a def and kicker but would not give me the time of day to pick a few bottom feeding wr to fill his lineup. your exact words to me was HE DOES HAVE A LEGAL LINEUP. legal my azz. No, we did not go off the ADP. The instructions were to fill his legal starting lineup first, before picking reserves. That is what we did. He got the highest ranked defense and kicker, then we went back to the top of the list.

And while he may not have a lineup filled with active players, he has a legal lineup with regards to players filling the requisite positions.

I'll let Fanball handle all further commenting, but will address anything via PM. [/QUOTE]1. Have you ever played FF before?
2. Have you kept up with players this off season?
3. Drafting 4 Wr's?
4. Drafting 4 QB's?
5. Drafting 6 RB's?

My guess is because of 3-5 is that IF you have played you have not done very well.

John [/QUOTE]You have NO skin in this contest. As per usual your post adds NOTHING to the thread. EVERYONE involved has explained their decisions. All you're doing is piling on here John. Can't you find some other board for your blather ? [/QUOTE]Steve,

I have no skin, because of what went down. If you can't figure that out that's on you. If you want we can have a drink and talk about it next week?

So I can and will ask questions because I do want to have skin in this Contest in the future.

Good Luck,

John

nolencole · Post by **nolencole** » Mon Sep 06, 2010 12:18 pm

I knew I brought my wife along for a reason...shes loving this female banter going back and forth between owners on the boards.

I did hear Todd or Seth say they had spoken to Tom and was informed on how to proceed....which they did.

Thanks to Tom and Greg for understanding the other owners opinions and lets get on with the season.

A.A

aka The Bosten Massacre

Raiders · Post by **Raiders** » Mon Sep 06, 2010 4:16 pm

'I hearf FIRST HAND that Todd went off of a wink and a nod to "help every owwner out that he could that was in this leagye:'

Glenn,

No way that's true. Stop posting stuff like that. It's bad enough what happen.

John

Old School · Post by **Old School** » Mon Sep 06, 2010 4:32 pm

Originally posted by Quahogs:
quote:Originally posted by Raiders:
quote:Originally posted by Todd Zola:
quote:Originally posted by THE_BLACKHAND:
todd , you went off the adp in the 9th and 10th rounds to get a def and kicker but would not give me the time of day to pick a few bottom feeding wr to fill his lineup. your exact words to me was HE DOES HAVE A LEGAL LINEUP. legal my azz. No, we did not go off the ADP. The instructions were to fill his legal starting lineup first, before picking reserves. That is what we did. He got the highest ranked defense and kicker, then we went back to the top of the list.

And while he may not have a lineup filled with active players, he has a legal lineup with regards to players filling the requisite positions.

I'll let Fanball handle all further commenting, but will address anything via PM. [/QUOTE]1. Have you ever played FF before?
2. Have you kept up with players this off season?
3. Drafting 4 Wr's?
4. Drafting 4 QB's?
5. Drafting 6 RB's?

My guess is because of 3-5 is that IF you have played you have not done very well.

John [/QUOTE]You have NO skin in this contest. As per usual your post adds NOTHING to the thread. EVERYONE involved has explained their decisions. All you're doing is piling on here John. Can't you find some other board for your blather ? [/QUOTE]Not in this draft, but Hogs'is right. Raider, you sure like to stir up sheet and criticize picks
for someone who hasn't done squat in FF.
... Geez Louise

Raiders · Post by **Raiders** » Mon Sep 06, 2010 4:37 pm

Originally posted by Old School:
quote:Originally posted by Quahogs:
quote:Originally posted by Raiders:
quote:Originally posted by Todd Zola:
quote:Originally posted by THE_BLACKHAND:
todd , you went off the adp in the 9th and 10th rounds to get a def and kicker but would not give me the time of day to pick a few bottom feeding wr to fill his lineup. your exact words to me was HE DOES HAVE A LEGAL LINEUP. legal my azz. No, we did not go off the ADP. The instructions were to fill his legal starting lineup first, before picking reserves. That is what we did. He got the highest ranked defense and kicker, then we went back to the top of the list.

And while he may not have a lineup filled with active players, he has a legal lineup with regards to players filling the requisite positions.

I'll let Fanball handle all further commenting, but will address anything via PM. [/QUOTE]1. Have you ever played FF before?
2. Have you kept up with players this off season?
3. Drafting 4 Wr's?
4. Drafting 4 QB's?
5. Drafting 6 RB's?

My guess is because of 3-5 is that IF you have played you have not done very well.

John [/QUOTE]You have NO skin in this contest. As per usual your post adds NOTHING to the thread. EVERYONE involved has explained their decisions. All you're doing is piling on here John. Can't you find some other board for your blather ? [/QUOTE]Not in this draft, but Hogs'is right. Raider, you sure like to stir up sheet and criticize picks
for someone who hasn't done squat in FF.
... Geez Louise [/QUOTE]Joe,

You can join Steve and myself to discuss forward.

John