NFFC Satellite League Results

mkrucek · Post by **mkrucek** » Thu Aug 23, 2007 7:37 am

Originally posted by KOTRAX:
WELL THE DRAFT SEEMS "SKEWED" ANYWAY. I REALLY WOULDN'T USE IT AS A GUIDE:

LYNCH AT 16
BREES AT 25 (BEFORE PALMER)
D. WILLIAMS AT 32

THESE PICKS DIDN'T WARRANT THAT SPOT. According to who?

KOTRAX · Post by **KOTRAX** » Thu Aug 23, 2007 7:43 am

Originally posted by 4D:
quote:Originally posted by KOTRAX:
WELL THE DRAFT SEEMS "SKEWED" ANYWAY. I REALLY WOULDN'T USE IT AS A GUIDE:

LYNCH AT 16
BREES AT 25 (BEFORE PALMER)
D. WILLIAMS AT 32

THESE PICKS DIDN'T WARRANT THAT SPOT. According to who? [/QUOTE]ACCORDING TO REALISTIC PROJECTIONS.

mkrucek · Post by **mkrucek** » Thu Aug 23, 2007 7:46 am

Originally posted by KOTRAX:
quote:Originally posted by 4D:
quote:Originally posted by KOTRAX:
WELL THE DRAFT SEEMS "SKEWED" ANYWAY. I REALLY WOULDN'T USE IT AS A GUIDE:

LYNCH AT 16
BREES AT 25 (BEFORE PALMER)
D. WILLIAMS AT 32

THESE PICKS DIDN'T WARRANT THAT SPOT. According to who? [/QUOTE]ACCORDING TO REALISTIC PROJECTIONS. [/QUOTE]What were Caddy's realistic projections last year? Or Jordan's? Or McGahee's?

KOTRAX · Post by **KOTRAX** » Thu Aug 23, 2007 7:53 am

Originally posted by 4D:
quote:Originally posted by KOTRAX:
quote:Originally posted by 4D:
quote:Originally posted by KOTRAX:
WELL THE DRAFT SEEMS "SKEWED" ANYWAY. I REALLY WOULDN'T USE IT AS A GUIDE:

LYNCH AT 16
BREES AT 25 (BEFORE PALMER)
D. WILLIAMS AT 32

THESE PICKS DIDN'T WARRANT THAT SPOT. According to who? [/QUOTE]ACCORDING TO REALISTIC PROJECTIONS. [/QUOTE]What were Caddy's realistic projections last year? Or Jordan's? Or McGahee's? [/QUOTE]THE SAME PLACE MANNING'S, L.T., L.J, AND HARRISONS WERE. FOR EVERY BUST YOU CAN NAME AND I CAN NAME A TWO PEOPLE WHO FINISHED WHERE THEY WERE PROJECTED AT.

mkrucek · Post by **mkrucek** » Thu Aug 23, 2007 7:59 am

Originally posted by KOTRAX:
quote:Originally posted by 4D:
quote:Originally posted by KOTRAX:
quote:Originally posted by 4D:
quote:Originally posted by KOTRAX:
WELL THE DRAFT SEEMS "SKEWED" ANYWAY. I REALLY WOULDN'T USE IT AS A GUIDE:

LYNCH AT 16
BREES AT 25 (BEFORE PALMER)
D. WILLIAMS AT 32

THESE PICKS DIDN'T WARRANT THAT SPOT. According to who? [/QUOTE]ACCORDING TO REALISTIC PROJECTIONS. [/QUOTE]What were Caddy's realistic projections last year? Or Jordan's? Or McGahee's? [/QUOTE]THE SAME PLACE MANNING'S, L.T., L.J, AND HARRISONS WERE. FOR EVERY BUST YOU CAN NAME AND I CAN NAME A TWO PEOPLE WHO FINISHED WHERE THEY WERE PROJECTED AT. [/QUOTE]You'd be wrong, but it's irrelevant to the argument.

KOTRAX · Post by **KOTRAX** » Thu Aug 23, 2007 8:08 am

Originally posted by 4D:
quote:Originally posted by KOTRAX:
quote:Originally posted by 4D:
quote:Originally posted by KOTRAX:
quote:Originally posted by 4D:
quote:Originally posted by KOTRAX:
WELL THE DRAFT SEEMS "SKEWED" ANYWAY. I REALLY WOULDN'T USE IT AS A GUIDE:

LYNCH AT 16
BREES AT 25 (BEFORE PALMER)
D. WILLIAMS AT 32

THESE PICKS DIDN'T WARRANT THAT SPOT. According to who? [/QUOTE]ACCORDING TO REALISTIC PROJECTIONS. [/QUOTE]What were Caddy's realistic projections last year? Or Jordan's? Or McGahee's? [/QUOTE]THE SAME PLACE MANNING'S, L.T., L.J, AND HARRISONS WERE. FOR EVERY BUST YOU CAN NAME AND I CAN NAME A TWO PEOPLE WHO FINISHED WHERE THEY WERE PROJECTED AT. [/QUOTE]You'd be wrong, but it's irrelevant to the argument. [/QUOTE]IF YOU SAY SO. I WOULDN'T BE WRONG BUT THAT IS YOUR OPINION. THE BOTTOM LINE I PICKED OUT THREE PEOPLE WHO ALL OTHER THINGS BEING EQUAL WERE TAKEN HIGH. NOW IF YOU WANT TO SIT THERE AND PULL OUT BUST FROM LAST YEAR THAT'S COOL. IF YOU GO TO THE HOME PAGE AND LOOK AT 2006 ADP A GOOD NUMBER OF THEM HELD THEIR RANKING. MORE SO THAN DIDN'T

mkrucek · Post by **mkrucek** » Thu Aug 23, 2007 8:13 am

Originally posted by KOTRAX:
quote:Originally posted by 4D:
quote:Originally posted by KOTRAX:
quote:Originally posted by 4D:
quote:Originally posted by KOTRAX:
quote:Originally posted by 4D:
quote:Originally posted by KOTRAX:
WELL THE DRAFT SEEMS "SKEWED" ANYWAY. I REALLY WOULDN'T USE IT AS A GUIDE:

LYNCH AT 16
BREES AT 25 (BEFORE PALMER)
D. WILLIAMS AT 32

THESE PICKS DIDN'T WARRANT THAT SPOT. According to who? [/QUOTE]ACCORDING TO REALISTIC PROJECTIONS. [/QUOTE]What were Caddy's realistic projections last year? Or Jordan's? Or McGahee's? [/QUOTE]THE SAME PLACE MANNING'S, L.T., L.J, AND HARRISONS WERE. FOR EVERY BUST YOU CAN NAME AND I CAN NAME A TWO PEOPLE WHO FINISHED WHERE THEY WERE PROJECTED AT. [/QUOTE]You'd be wrong, but it's irrelevant to the argument. [/QUOTE]IF YOU SAY SO. I WOULDN'T BE WRONG BUT THAT IS YOUR OPINION. THE BOTTOM LINE I PICKED OUT THREE PEOPLE WHO ALL OTHER THINGS BEING EQUAL WERE TAKEN HIGH. NOW IF YOU WANT TO SIT THERE AND PULL OUT BUST FROM LAST YEAR THAT'S COOL. IF YOU GO TO THE HOME PAGE AND LOOK AT 2006 ADP A GOOD NUMBER OF THEM HELD THEIR RANKING. MORE SO THAN DIDN'T [/QUOTE]Actually you picked 4 so I can't see how I can trust you on your numbers.

KOTRAX · Post by **KOTRAX** » Thu Aug 23, 2007 8:19 am

Originally posted by 4D:
quote:Originally posted by KOTRAX:
quote:Originally posted by 4D:
quote:Originally posted by KOTRAX:
quote:Originally posted by 4D:
quote:Originally posted by KOTRAX:
quote:Originally posted by 4D:
quote:Originally posted by KOTRAX:
WELL THE DRAFT SEEMS "SKEWED" ANYWAY. I REALLY WOULDN'T USE IT AS A GUIDE:

LYNCH AT 16
BREES AT 25 (BEFORE PALMER)
D. WILLIAMS AT 32

THESE PICKS DIDN'T WARRANT THAT SPOT. According to who? [/QUOTE]ACCORDING TO REALISTIC PROJECTIONS. [/QUOTE]What were Caddy's realistic projections last year? Or Jordan's? Or McGahee's? [/QUOTE]THE SAME PLACE MANNING'S, L.T., L.J, AND HARRISONS WERE. FOR EVERY BUST YOU CAN NAME AND I CAN NAME A TWO PEOPLE WHO FINISHED WHERE THEY WERE PROJECTED AT. [/QUOTE]You'd be wrong, but it's irrelevant to the argument. [/QUOTE]IF YOU SAY SO. I WOULDN'T BE WRONG BUT THAT IS YOUR OPINION. THE BOTTOM LINE I PICKED OUT THREE PEOPLE WHO ALL OTHER THINGS BEING EQUAL WERE TAKEN HIGH. NOW IF YOU WANT TO SIT THERE AND PULL OUT BUST FROM LAST YEAR THAT'S COOL. IF YOU GO TO THE HOME PAGE AND LOOK AT 2006 ADP A GOOD NUMBER OF THEM HELD THEIR RANKING. MORE SO THAN DIDN'T [/QUOTE]Actually you picked 4 so I can't see how I can trust you on your numbers. [/QUOTE]DO YOU WANT ME TO PICK MORE BECAUSE I CAN? I AM JUST SAYING YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT THE BUST WHEN I SAID REALISTIC PROJECTIONS. TALK ABOUT THE PEOPLE WHO DID WHAT THEY WERE PROJECTED TO DO AS WELL. IT IS MORE WHO DID THAN DIDN'T. THAT'S WHAT I AM SAYING.

LETSROLL2007 · Post by **LETSROLL2007** » Thu Aug 23, 2007 8:23 am

I agree with Quahogs . 3RR and 4RR would do the trick to even things (at least this year). It's an attempt at least by NFCC to improve