2007 NFFC Plans

renman
Posts: 2837
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2004 6:00 pm

2007 NFFC Plans

Post by renman » Tue Jan 02, 2007 10:41 am

King,

Here in grown-up land we are not overly worried with what others think of us or "proving" these kinds of things. Plus the word "private" in the term "private message" actually does have some meaning to some here.

Guys, I have zero interest in the teen stuff here.

Back to NFFC topics...

-I hope the NFFC uses those digital timers again next season. Not sure if they own them or rented them or it was a trial thing but I really thought they were helpful and a nice added touch...

I just saw that Tom had to swoop in and bring some maturity back to this thread. Glad he did. Lets see who has interest in the TOPIC of the thread.

-How do people feel about the Half a point per reception in the NFFC? (I love it)
-Are we any closer to knowing if and when a decision will be made on 3RR for 2007?
-Does anyone care to talk any about slightly expanding rosters for the playoffs?

Sound Advice
Posts: 541
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 6:00 pm

2007 NFFC Plans

Post by Sound Advice » Tue Jan 02, 2007 10:56 am

Originally posted by renman:

-Does anyone care to talk any about slightly expanding rosters for the playoffs? I'm for bumping the rosters up to 19 for the full season if 3RR is implemented.

King of Queens
Posts: 5262
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 6:00 pm

2007 NFFC Plans

Post by King of Queens » Tue Jan 02, 2007 11:07 am

Originally posted by renman:
Guys, I have zero interest in the teen stuff here...I just saw that Tom had to swoop in and bring some maturity back to this thread. Glad he did.If you have zero interest, then why do you continue to bring it up?

You continue to portray yourself as innocent, but somehow you're always involved in the "controversy". Time for some New Year's self-reflection.

TamuScarecrow
Posts: 2509
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2004 6:00 pm

2007 NFFC Plans

Post by TamuScarecrow » Tue Jan 02, 2007 11:10 am

I like the blocked kick idea as that is another game-changing play that ought to be considered for D/ST points.

Disappointed in GLY as having teamed with him in the Chicago DC, he is a true gentleman, but to think only of yourself and not the damage Chris Weinke did to my Carolina D was pretty thoughtless for someone of your high moral stature. :D Any magazine that puts Carolina's D in the top 10 next year is automatically scratched off my list for future use.

-Points per reception is good the way it is.
-3RR should be a go for 2007.
-Agree that rosters should be expanded to 20 players for the playoffs through FAAB.
-Excited about drafting in Tampa next year.
2005 NY/CHI League Champ
2006 CHI#2 3rd Place
2006 Auction Reg Season Champ
2007 TAM#2 2nd Place
2007 Auction Reg Season Champ
2009 LV#5 League Champ
2010 Auction Reg Season Champ
2011 LV#3 2nd Place
2012 LV Classic League Champ

mkrucek
Posts: 555
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 6:00 pm

2007 NFFC Plans

Post by mkrucek » Tue Jan 02, 2007 11:13 am

[QUOTE]Originally posted by renman:
King,

Here in grown-up land we are not overly worried with what others think of us or "proving" these kinds of things. Plus the word "private" in the term "private message" actually does have some meaning to some here.

Yet you found the need to mention them.

Guys, I have zero interest in the teen stuff here.

Yet you respond in immature fashion to every post, much like a teen...especially with all the lols you use. But I suppose that's ok, since you end every post with your wish for football talk.
You'll be fine long as your pretty face holds out, then it's gonna get pretty cold out...

renman
Posts: 2837
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2004 6:00 pm

2007 NFFC Plans

Post by renman » Tue Jan 02, 2007 11:18 am

King,

I BRING UP football topics. I occasionally mock and highlight TEEN LEVEL behavior in hopes it goes away when exposed. I am going to return to the topic of football, feel free to join if you want. If obsessing over me is your main interest, why not make a thread for it? This is a football thread.

Sound,

Why do you think 3RR should in any way impact roster size? I am not saying I disagree, just wondering what your logic is.

4D,

They obsess over me, I highlight it. Dare you comment on their behavior or only mine for highlighting it? Commenting on their behavior will lose you message board popularity. I type "lol" because some of the behavior displayed here by adult or even middle aged men is laughable. I tried ignoring, they never stop. If they never acted like teens, I never would have to comment on it. One is the primary problem, care to comment? I assume no.

[ January 02, 2007, 05:23 PM: Message edited by: renman ]

renman
Posts: 2837
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2004 6:00 pm

2007 NFFC Plans

Post by renman » Tue Jan 02, 2007 11:29 am

Originally posted by Tamuscarecrow:
I like the blocked kick idea as that is another game-changing play that ought to be considered for D/ST points.

Disappointed in GLY as having teamed with him in the Chicago DC, he is a true gentleman, but to think only of yourself and not the damage Chris Weinke did to my Carolina D was pretty thoughtless for someone of your high moral stature. :D Any magazine that puts Carolina's D in the top 10 next year is automatically scratched off my list for future use.

-Points per reception is good the way it is.
-3RR should be a go for 2007.
-Agree that rosters should be expanded to 20 players for the playoffs through FAAB.
-Excited about drafting in Tampa next year. Ah, I knew there were some actual fantasy football players here.

-I love the half a point per reception that the NFFC has. I like how it stops a RB who is not productive in an offense that is failing, from running up overly huge numbers based solely on dump offs in garbage time. At least this cuts that in half.

-The more I think about it the more I like 3RR for the NFFC in 07. I think it will require Greg and Tom to do a good bit or educating and promoting, but I think it adds a lot of texture to the event and eliminates a ton of whining.

-How would rosters be increased via faab for the post season? (don't disagree, just wondering how). Would each team get to bid on players within the leagues they came from? Why would teams elimated from the post season bid against them? Unless you would do this with a couple weeks left in the regular season.

King of Queens
Posts: 5262
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 6:00 pm

2007 NFFC Plans

Post by King of Queens » Tue Jan 02, 2007 11:39 am

Originally posted by renman:
I occasionally mock and highlight TEEN LEVEL behavior in hopes it goes away when exposed. Wouldn't mocking teen behavior make you just as guilty?

An alternate strategy would probably yield better results.

King of Queens
Posts: 5262
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 6:00 pm

2007 NFFC Plans

Post by King of Queens » Tue Jan 02, 2007 11:43 am

Originally posted by renman:
They obsess over me, I highlight it. Dare you comment on their behavior or only mine for highlighting it? Commenting on their behavior will lose you message board popularity. I type "lol" because some of the behavior displayed here by adult or even middle aged men is laughable. I tried ignoring, they never stop. If they never acted like teens, I never would have to comment on it. One is the primary problem, care to comment? I assume no. Again, look at the situation closely. Something is causing this "obsession" -- surely it must be something you're doing.

With only one exception, every time Greg or Tom have had to "swoop in", you've been involved. Doesn't that speak volumes?

renman
Posts: 2837
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2004 6:00 pm

2007 NFFC Plans

Post by renman » Tue Jan 02, 2007 11:44 am

King,

I have tried ignoring, the obsession continues. So if ignoring wont make it go away, and those who act like this wont grow up, I might as well enjoy riling guys up right? I have seen Greg and Tom talk about Gekko threads, Billy Waz/snake battles numerous times without me posting once in the thread.

On a sidenote, do you have ANY interest in discussing football? If you do, I would be interested in seeing an example of it. If you don't why are you in this thread?

[ January 02, 2007, 05:45 PM: Message edited by: renman ]

Post Reply