Has anyone noticed?
Has anyone noticed?
ANOTHER POINT IS THAT WHAT WAS THE ADP (IN THE NFFC) FOR CHAD AND STEVE. I WAS IN SOME LEAGUES SEEING THEM GO AS HIGH AS NINE AND TEN RESPECTIVELY. SO THE BACK END MAY NOT BE THE PLACE IT DEPENDS ON WHEN YOU WANT TO PULL THE TRIGGER ON CERTAIN PLAYERS.
Has anyone noticed?
Originally posted by Teebags1:
quote:Originally posted by 4D:
quote:Originally posted by Teebags1:
That's why I said stats. And it still further proves the fact that the whole year needs to play out before making a judgement call on 3RR.
The bigger question is are more people mad that they aren't winning because they took LT2 or SJ or that 3RR really seems to not have worked at all? What? You have innaccurate lists that you want to use as proof. At least get your facts straight. [/QUOTE]Okay I'm talking strictly stats pulled off of NFL.com of the top 5 at each position. It says it at the top of my quoted post. So my facts are straight. Secondly it's all in how you draft anyways. The guy who took Tomlinson in our league is putting up monster points even with out the record performance of LT so 3RR didn't affect him like others at the 1 spot. And again if we're talking scoring points the second list that was posted would still show that this year is the exception to the stud theory so far. Bottom line fantasy football is ALOT of luck through situation and injuries and because someone's team isn't doing good doesn't make 3RR a failure. K sweet cheeks? [/QUOTE]Well, I fail to see where you have nfl.com stats in any part of your post, but whatever. Maybe you did it with invisible ink. Until we score by their stats it's useless here. So get your stats and facts straight.
quote:Originally posted by 4D:
quote:Originally posted by Teebags1:
That's why I said stats. And it still further proves the fact that the whole year needs to play out before making a judgement call on 3RR.
The bigger question is are more people mad that they aren't winning because they took LT2 or SJ or that 3RR really seems to not have worked at all? What? You have innaccurate lists that you want to use as proof. At least get your facts straight. [/QUOTE]Okay I'm talking strictly stats pulled off of NFL.com of the top 5 at each position. It says it at the top of my quoted post. So my facts are straight. Secondly it's all in how you draft anyways. The guy who took Tomlinson in our league is putting up monster points even with out the record performance of LT so 3RR didn't affect him like others at the 1 spot. And again if we're talking scoring points the second list that was posted would still show that this year is the exception to the stud theory so far. Bottom line fantasy football is ALOT of luck through situation and injuries and because someone's team isn't doing good doesn't make 3RR a failure. K sweet cheeks? [/QUOTE]Well, I fail to see where you have nfl.com stats in any part of your post, but whatever. Maybe you did it with invisible ink. Until we score by their stats it's useless here. So get your stats and facts straight.
You'll be fine long as your pretty face holds out, then it's gonna get pretty cold out...
Has anyone noticed?
Yeah I'm sure stat's inc. uses different yardage stats than NFL.com. Really no matter how you slice it their stats shouldn't vary by any means from site to site. That's why I said "Stats" not "Scoring", read it again. First line of my first post...."If you look at the leaders in stats through week 2".....I've said it 3 times already. I'm not making them up out of thin air or invisible ink. I might try using a larger font so you could read them.
[ September 19, 2007, 10:39 AM: Message edited by: Teebags1 ]
[ September 19, 2007, 10:39 AM: Message edited by: Teebags1 ]
Marriage is the leading cause of impotence.
Has anyone noticed?
Originally posted by Teebags1:
Yeah I'm sure stat's inc. uses different yardage stats than NFL.com. Really no matter how you slice it their stats shouldn't vary by any means from site to site. That's why I said "Stats" not "Scoring", read it again. First line of my first post...."If you look at the leaders in stats through week 2".....I've said it 3 times already. I'm not making them up out of thin air or invisible ink. I might try using a larger font so you could read them. Teebags1, just tell me there's no Teebags2, or 3 or 4. One of you is plenty. I'm still looking for the NFL.com you said was at the top of your first post.
Yeah I'm sure stat's inc. uses different yardage stats than NFL.com. Really no matter how you slice it their stats shouldn't vary by any means from site to site. That's why I said "Stats" not "Scoring", read it again. First line of my first post...."If you look at the leaders in stats through week 2".....I've said it 3 times already. I'm not making them up out of thin air or invisible ink. I might try using a larger font so you could read them. Teebags1, just tell me there's no Teebags2, or 3 or 4. One of you is plenty. I'm still looking for the NFL.com you said was at the top of your first post.
You'll be fine long as your pretty face holds out, then it's gonna get pretty cold out...
-
Nutty Scrat
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 6:00 pm
Has anyone noticed?
Originally posted by BillyWaz:
Those are some interesting numbers, but once LT, S-Jax, LJ, etc. get going, I'm sure things will even out a bit.
The teams at the back (11-14) are doing well because of getting Smith and/or CJ and in some cases even Andre Johnson. Once they cool down a bit (looks like Andre won't be scoring this weekend), things should even out a bit.
One thing so far, it appears that the 6-8 (i.e. middle) was not the place to be. Will be interesting to see if that changes. Hi Billywaz. I'm non-committal either way on 3RR right now but I guess what my question would be what happens if there is no LT, Stephen Jackson or LJ type players in the future and now how does the 3RR system look at that point. There stats were so dominating in the front of the draft in prior years how does 3RR work when you don't have those type of players? Are picks 10 -14 the new 1-5 in future drafts and noone wants the top 10 places? Just like everyone was clammering for a top 3 place in prior years will everyone be clammering for the bottom of the draft now? Somethings that make one go hmmmmmmmmmm? Have a good day!
Those are some interesting numbers, but once LT, S-Jax, LJ, etc. get going, I'm sure things will even out a bit.
The teams at the back (11-14) are doing well because of getting Smith and/or CJ and in some cases even Andre Johnson. Once they cool down a bit (looks like Andre won't be scoring this weekend), things should even out a bit.
One thing so far, it appears that the 6-8 (i.e. middle) was not the place to be. Will be interesting to see if that changes. Hi Billywaz. I'm non-committal either way on 3RR right now but I guess what my question would be what happens if there is no LT, Stephen Jackson or LJ type players in the future and now how does the 3RR system look at that point. There stats were so dominating in the front of the draft in prior years how does 3RR work when you don't have those type of players? Are picks 10 -14 the new 1-5 in future drafts and noone wants the top 10 places? Just like everyone was clammering for a top 3 place in prior years will everyone be clammering for the bottom of the draft now? Somethings that make one go hmmmmmmmmmm? Have a good day!
Ed
-
ultimatefs
- Posts: 2393
- Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 6:00 pm
Has anyone noticed?
Originally posted by Nutty Scrat:
I guess what my question would be what happens if there is no LT, Stephen Jackson or LJ type players in the future When has this ever occurred?
I guess what my question would be what happens if there is no LT, Stephen Jackson or LJ type players in the future When has this ever occurred?
Jules is a Dirt bag and makes my luck.
Has anyone noticed?
Originally posted by Nutty Scrat:
quote:Originally posted by BillyWaz:
Those are some interesting numbers, but once LT, S-Jax, LJ, etc. get going, I'm sure things will even out a bit.
The teams at the back (11-14) are doing well because of getting Smith and/or CJ and in some cases even Andre Johnson. Once they cool down a bit (looks like Andre won't be scoring this weekend), things should even out a bit.
One thing so far, it appears that the 6-8 (i.e. middle) was not the place to be. Will be interesting to see if that changes. Hi Billywaz. I'm non-committal either way on 3RR right now but I guess what my question would be what happens if there is no LT, Stephen Jackson or LJ type players in the future and now how does the 3RR system look at that point. There stats were so dominating in the front of the draft in prior years how does 3RR work when you don't have those type of players? Are picks 10 -14 the new 1-5 in future drafts and noone wants the top 10 places? Just like everyone was clammering for a top 3 place in prior years will everyone be clammering for the bottom of the draft now? Somethings that make one go hmmmmmmmmmm? Have a good day! [/QUOTE]YEAH ED THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN BROUGHT UP. I THINK 3RR WILL BE A CONSUSEUS OF THE PLAYERS FOR THAT YEAR. IF THE VALUE FROM THE 1 PICK TO THE 6TH IS APPROXIMATELY THE SAME LIKE IN 03. (TOMLINSON, R. WILLIAMS, HOLMES, PORTIS, FAULK, AND S. ALEXANDER) THEN I THINK 3RR WILL BE THROWN OUT. BUT IF IT'S LIKE THIS YEAR WITH L.T. AND S. JAX (ALTHOUGH THE STATS DO SAY IT NOW) STANDING HEAD AND SHOULDERS OVER THE OTHERS THEN IT WILL BE USED ONCE AGAIN.
quote:Originally posted by BillyWaz:
Those are some interesting numbers, but once LT, S-Jax, LJ, etc. get going, I'm sure things will even out a bit.
The teams at the back (11-14) are doing well because of getting Smith and/or CJ and in some cases even Andre Johnson. Once they cool down a bit (looks like Andre won't be scoring this weekend), things should even out a bit.
One thing so far, it appears that the 6-8 (i.e. middle) was not the place to be. Will be interesting to see if that changes. Hi Billywaz. I'm non-committal either way on 3RR right now but I guess what my question would be what happens if there is no LT, Stephen Jackson or LJ type players in the future and now how does the 3RR system look at that point. There stats were so dominating in the front of the draft in prior years how does 3RR work when you don't have those type of players? Are picks 10 -14 the new 1-5 in future drafts and noone wants the top 10 places? Just like everyone was clammering for a top 3 place in prior years will everyone be clammering for the bottom of the draft now? Somethings that make one go hmmmmmmmmmm? Have a good day! [/QUOTE]YEAH ED THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN BROUGHT UP. I THINK 3RR WILL BE A CONSUSEUS OF THE PLAYERS FOR THAT YEAR. IF THE VALUE FROM THE 1 PICK TO THE 6TH IS APPROXIMATELY THE SAME LIKE IN 03. (TOMLINSON, R. WILLIAMS, HOLMES, PORTIS, FAULK, AND S. ALEXANDER) THEN I THINK 3RR WILL BE THROWN OUT. BUT IF IT'S LIKE THIS YEAR WITH L.T. AND S. JAX (ALTHOUGH THE STATS DO SAY IT NOW) STANDING HEAD AND SHOULDERS OVER THE OTHERS THEN IT WILL BE USED ONCE AGAIN.
Has anyone noticed?
I have not asked for any payment yet.But,if Greg wishes to mail me one I promise to smile big and proud for the cover(bring the wide angle lens).One only has to remember Jules huge run for the regular season last year to know the playoffs bring home the check.Heck,two weeks hasn't even got my wife paying attention to football yet.When I sat down at the draft table I hoped to get Chad Johnson and Steve Smith to start.But,Johnson went before my turn.I did not expect Rudi Johnson to be available so I jumped on him instead.I had planned on getting my QB in the later rounds.But,could not resist Carson Palmer to start the third.We have a lot of season left to see how it pans out.Ground Rats Tampa 3
Has anyone noticed?
Originally posted by 4D:
quote:Originally posted by Teebags1:
Yeah I'm sure stat's inc. uses different yardage stats than NFL.com. Really no matter how you slice it their stats shouldn't vary by any means from site to site. That's why I said "Stats" not "Scoring", read it again. First line of my first post...."If you look at the leaders in stats through week 2".....I've said it 3 times already. I'm not making them up out of thin air or invisible ink. I might try using a larger font so you could read them. Teebags1, just tell me there's no Teebags2, or 3 or 4. One of you is plenty. I'm still looking for the NFL.com you said was at the top of your first post. [/QUOTE]It doesn't matter what site I got the stats from as long as they're correct. STATS not POINTS......and yes I'm trying to infect the world with Teebags!LOL
quote:Originally posted by Teebags1:
Yeah I'm sure stat's inc. uses different yardage stats than NFL.com. Really no matter how you slice it their stats shouldn't vary by any means from site to site. That's why I said "Stats" not "Scoring", read it again. First line of my first post...."If you look at the leaders in stats through week 2".....I've said it 3 times already. I'm not making them up out of thin air or invisible ink. I might try using a larger font so you could read them. Teebags1, just tell me there's no Teebags2, or 3 or 4. One of you is plenty. I'm still looking for the NFL.com you said was at the top of your first post. [/QUOTE]It doesn't matter what site I got the stats from as long as they're correct. STATS not POINTS......and yes I'm trying to infect the world with Teebags!LOL
Marriage is the leading cause of impotence.
Has anyone noticed?
Originally posted by Teebags1:
quote:Originally posted by 4D:
quote:Originally posted by Teebags1:
Yeah I'm sure stat's inc. uses different yardage stats than NFL.com. Really no matter how you slice it their stats shouldn't vary by any means from site to site. That's why I said "Stats" not "Scoring", read it again. First line of my first post...."If you look at the leaders in stats through week 2".....I've said it 3 times already. I'm not making them up out of thin air or invisible ink. I might try using a larger font so you could read them. Teebags1, just tell me there's no Teebags2, or 3 or 4. One of you is plenty. I'm still looking for the NFL.com you said was at the top of your first post. [/QUOTE]It doesn't matter what site I got the stats from as long as they're correct. STATS not POINTS......and yes I'm trying to infect the world with Teebags!LOL [/QUOTE]Guys get a room, I'll give you a tape measure.
So you guys can have something to still argue about.
quote:Originally posted by 4D:
quote:Originally posted by Teebags1:
Yeah I'm sure stat's inc. uses different yardage stats than NFL.com. Really no matter how you slice it their stats shouldn't vary by any means from site to site. That's why I said "Stats" not "Scoring", read it again. First line of my first post...."If you look at the leaders in stats through week 2".....I've said it 3 times already. I'm not making them up out of thin air or invisible ink. I might try using a larger font so you could read them. Teebags1, just tell me there's no Teebags2, or 3 or 4. One of you is plenty. I'm still looking for the NFL.com you said was at the top of your first post. [/QUOTE]It doesn't matter what site I got the stats from as long as they're correct. STATS not POINTS......and yes I'm trying to infect the world with Teebags!LOL [/QUOTE]Guys get a room, I'll give you a tape measure.
So you guys can have something to still argue about.