AFC is anybodies

Post Reply
mattjb
Posts: 1651
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 6:00 pm

AFC is anybodies

Post by mattjb » Sun Jan 01, 2012 6:41 am

Even if the Pats come back and win this their defense is a joke.

Rog
Posts: 328
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 6:00 pm

AFC is anybodies

Post by Rog » Sun Jan 01, 2012 8:08 am

if the pack and pats play in the superbowl the under/over might be 87

TR
Posts: 634
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 6:00 pm

AFC is anybodies

Post by TR » Sun Jan 01, 2012 8:27 am

pats wont get past Steelers

NorCalAtlFan
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 6:00 pm

AFC is anybodies

Post by NorCalAtlFan » Sun Jan 01, 2012 8:38 am

anybodies but the J E T S!!! lol.
my year has been made already(assuming phins don't sanchez it up)

particra
Posts: 753
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 6:00 pm

AFC is anybodies

Post by particra » Sun Jan 01, 2012 9:00 am

Originally posted by TR:
pats wont get past Steelers Pats generally destroy the Steelers. Terrible matchup for Steelers D.

BillyWaz
Posts: 10913
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 6:00 pm

AFC is anybodies

Post by BillyWaz » Sun Jan 01, 2012 9:00 am

Not that it mattered today fantasy-wise, but Santonio Holmes won't even be on my list next year....

What an a-hole! :mad:

NorCalAtlFan
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 6:00 pm

AFC is anybodies

Post by NorCalAtlFan » Sun Jan 01, 2012 9:02 am

in holmes defense, he's always been an a-hole.

TR
Posts: 634
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 6:00 pm

AFC is anybodies

Post by TR » Sun Jan 01, 2012 9:12 am

Originally posted by Hells Satans:
quote:Originally posted by TR:
pats wont get past Steelers Pats generally destroy the Steelers. Terrible matchup for Steelers D. [/QUOTE]Steelers D adjusted....see what they did to pats earlier this season

BillyWaz
Posts: 10913
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 6:00 pm

AFC is anybodies

Post by BillyWaz » Sun Jan 01, 2012 9:16 am

Originally posted by NorCalAtlFan:
in holmes defense, he's always been an a-hole. I know, but I figured the talent would eventually rise to the surface and he would grow up.

I sure was wrong.

Post Reply