If as Todd suggests this was a DM style league, it is not so relevant after the first two rounds....still the teams going so early for the "stud" quarterbacks will likely pay for that later.
What has been prominent in both "pay" leagues and mock drafts (hopefully the more serious ones) is the widely divergent views on draft strategies and value of WR vs RB.
I think we will see RB dominate the top three to five picks in Round 1 and then it really depends on personal preference....or risk tolerance. The question really becomes at what point would you think that Larry Fitzgerald or Andre Johnson is a better first round investment than the "best" (in YOUR opinion) running back available.
There have been several comments about the "running back value" falling to the fourth and fifth rounds...BUT that is not only subject to personal views of each drafter but the ability to put together a team from very different draft paths.
As usual the drafter who is well prepared, and can let the draft "come to them" and find a way to assemble a solid team with upside rather than jumping too early on some players will be in better shape when we actually sit down to draft in September.......but I also suspect you will see widely divergent draft boards and be shocked at some of the picks made by other groups of drafters while we have a beverage between the Classic and Prime Time drafts......
Pay League Results: Very Interesting
Pay League Results: Very Interesting
It was a DC league.