Seeking Feedback From Draft Champions Members

lumpy463 · Post by **lumpy463** » Tue Dec 07, 2004 3:32 pm

I have to like it since we are in first place.
I would do it again. Count me in for 2005!
No changes needed.
Would want it to be the first draft again.
Personally, I think it was great preparation for the other drafts.

Derek "Lumpy" Anderson

Greg Ambrosius · Post by **Greg Ambrosius** » Tue Dec 07, 2004 4:20 pm

Great feedback guys. I almost agree that there's no reason why we couldn't go a few more rounds. Maybe 24 is too few. Injuries certainly played a big factor this year and I know that some teams were without TEs and Ks even though they may have drafted three of each. I propose 26 rounds for 2005, as that's just two more roster spots, but it could be two BIG roster spots. Any thoughts on that?

I definitely would just offer this as a $650 league. Thanks for the feedback as I'll keep it on the menu in 2005 and maybe we'll even add a few more leagues.

Dyv · Post by **Dyv** » Tue Dec 07, 2004 5:09 pm

Two more rounds never hurts, maybe gets a few more Nick Goings' into the mix

I'd even be willing to go 4 more rounds for backup QB's and such.

Heck, I lost 2 kickers on draft weekend this year, lol... I need to research backup kickers!

Dyv

lumpy463 · Post by **lumpy463** » Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:47 am

I would be opposed to two more rounds, but of course I would still play.

The most amazing thing to me about this draft was the amount of people who did not know or understand the rules, rosters, requirements, etc. and donated there $650.

Adding more roster spots just increases a luck factor to me.

Derek "Lumpy" Anderson

Eddiejag · Post by **Eddiejag** » Wed Dec 08, 2004 3:32 pm

STORM TROOPERS I ALSO BOMBED, OF THE THREE ,THIS ONE I WOULD HAVE TO THINK ABOUT. ITS TOUGH TO DO THE BIG THREE IN ONE WEEKEND. BY DROPPING ONE , MIGHT STOP FANTASY BURNOUT.

moyer1313 · Post by **moyer1313** » Thu Dec 09, 2004 7:17 am

I will definitely be back.

I like the roster limits as they are. Going to 25 might not be too bad, but 26 is too many.

I think that increasing the number of roster spots will just increase the chances of someone's team getting better just because some player got injured.

I can attempt to minimize the weakening of my team in case my starting RB does get injured.

I can not do anything to prepare for Team A getting better simply because Team B's starting RB happens to get injured and Team A happens to have the backup RB to the RB that got injured.

The fewer the roster spots, the less chance of someone's team getting better just because someone got injured.

Mark Moyer
Follow Me
Las Vegas Draft Champions League