3RR/KDS, What Do You Think?

Quahogs · Post by **Quahogs** » Thu Nov 30, 2006 4:53 am

Originally posted by SNAKE:
...SNAKE fully understands the potential beneficial ramifications of 3RR for those owners drafting from the back of the draft and the potential pitfalls for those owners drafting from the front of the draft (thus potentially achieving the objective of leveling the playing field), but unless SNAKE is missing something here, WHAT exactly are the potential benefits and/or pitfalls regarding those owners drafting from the middle slots?...thanks...SNAKE 1 benefit is that the 1,2,3 teams won't be as strong opening up the middle to close the gap point wise.

Q

Quahogs · Post by **Quahogs** » Thu Nov 30, 2006 4:56 am

Originally posted by SNAKE:
...on a different note here Q, SNAKE sorely misses your humor pic postings...SNAKE im dying snakes. so many ideas and nowhere to dump them.

whether dumb, total misses or spot on I miss the canvas.

Q

Gordon Gekko · Post by **Gordon Gekko** » Thu Nov 30, 2006 5:01 am

Originally posted by felixflamingo:
Changing to 3RR is reactionary.

Very few times will the preseason #1 pick be dead-on and not only be dead-on but also give a 10 point advantage...

Making a huge issue out of something that has happened once or twice since Fantasy Football has been invented. 2005
12 out of the top 28 owners (43%) came from slots 1/2/3

2006
19 out of the top 32 owners (59%) came from slots 1/2/3

if all draft slots were equal, the % should only be 21%. 2005 was double that!!

2006 is nearly TRIPLE!!

i'm tired of playing high stakes contests where the deck is stacked against you if you don't have a top slot.

[ November 30, 2006, 11:02 AM: Message edited by: Gordon Gekko ]

Greg Ambrosius · Post by **Greg Ambrosius** » Thu Nov 30, 2006 5:14 am

Originally posted by SNAKE:
Quahogs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by SNAKE:
...on a different note here Q, SNAKE sorely misses your humor pic postings...SNAKE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

im dying snakes. so many ideas and nowhere to dump them.

whether dumb, total misses or spot on I miss the canvas.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SNAKE and many others do as well...you're probably feeling like Linus sans blanket...when can we get them back?...SNAKE If you logged onto the MBs early this morning, you'd have seen a spam link with about 20 links to porn sites, with missing spots for photos. Trust me, this morning I was glad we disabled the photos link! Now if we can just find a better way to block these damn spammers, I'm all for it and we'll return to the days of Quahogs as our greatest asset to the Message Boards!

Quahogs · Post by **Quahogs** » Thu Nov 30, 2006 5:21 am

Snakes,

Well they cant have what was happening continue. Spammers posting obscenely objectionable material or just clogging the MB selling their wares. I dont know if it's individuals or some kind of MB 'bot that is able to do it. Whatever needs to be done to fix this will require more $ (for advanced filtering) and/or more manpower (for constant monitoring ie registered users manually given rights to post) I'm not a techie but to me the pics will prob be down for a while.

Q

Quahogs · Post by **Quahogs** » Thu Nov 30, 2006 5:26 am

Originally posted by Greg Ambrosius:
If you logged onto the MBs early this morning, you'd have seen a spam link with about 20 links to porn sites, with missing spots for photos. Trust me, this morning I was glad we disabled the photos link! Now if we can just find a better way to block these damn spammers, I'm all for it and we'll return to the days of Quahogs as our greatest asset to the Message Boards!

LOL! too kind Greg. The smart idea guys you got here are the big $ makers. Im just the court jester !.

Q