Flex

Gordon Gekko · Post by **Gordon Gekko** » Sun Aug 07, 2005 2:57 am

Originally posted by Nag':
you're welcome to believe you're right and everyone else is wrong, as you normally do. this has served me well in the past.

Gordon Gekko · Post by **Gordon Gekko** » Sun Aug 07, 2005 2:59 am

Originally posted by Nag':
You're spinning it Gekko. answer me one question mr nag. if the flex spot was open to QB, K, D, who do you think would get more points out of that flex spot for the year, YOU or a "non-skilled" owner? for sake of this question i'm assuming you are a "skilled" owner.

Nag' · Post by **Nag'** » Sun Aug 07, 2005 3:39 am

I have already spend more time than I should've here. Good luck with this new vendetta, Gordon.

Gordon Gekko · Post by **Gordon Gekko** » Sun Aug 07, 2005 5:16 am

Originally posted by Nag':
I have already spend more time than I should've here. Good luck with this new vendetta, Gordon. that's what i thought. get a good discussion going, and press nag to answer a legit question and you go away?

dgamblnman · Post by **dgamblnman** » Sun Aug 07, 2005 6:40 pm

Originally posted by Gordon Gekko:
quote:Originally posted by Nag':
You're spinning it Gekko. answer me one question mr nag. if the flex spot was open to QB, K, D, who do you think would get more points out of that flex spot for the year, YOU or a "non-skilled" owner? for sake of this question i'm assuming you are a "skilled" owner. [/QUOTE]Gordon, answer this...

Comparing current flex to your proposed flex option, whose flex position production percentage will increase more? Yours, or a non-skilled owner?