Would You Consider Kentucky Derby Style In 2006?

Route Collectors
Posts: 3525
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 6:00 pm

Would You Consider Kentucky Derby Style In 2006?

Post by Route Collectors » Sat Nov 26, 2005 6:43 am

Originally posted by GOD Loves You:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Nag':
[qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by GOD Loves You:
[qb]

I think I am going to complain too: I picked up Joe Nedney to be my kicker and he is now probably going to be out for the game this week.

Heh heh that's too funny. I did the EXACT same thing. :rolleyes:
It had to happen the week F/A is locked on Wednesday as well.
Lucky for me I have another kicker, although I was really looking forward to the matchup with Tennessee. ;)

Nag'
Posts: 1169
Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 6:00 pm

Would You Consider Kentucky Derby Style In 2006?

Post by Nag' » Sat Nov 26, 2005 7:03 am

Originally posted by GOD Loves You:
quote:Originally posted by Nag':
quote:Originally posted by GOD Loves You:
And yes 3INTBOY, I, and many others are amazed at your lack of understanding when it came to the flex position. But I guess that should be expected from a "boy" Just an FYI, his "lack of understanding" of the Flex position will result in correction of the software for 2006 season and beyond which will allow players to be assigned & re-assigned as a Flex without being locked in.

Was that expected from a "boy"? :rolleyes:
[/QUOTE]How can you call it a "correction" when that is how it was intended to be?

It's not like there was a glitch and he couldn't make the change.

Nag, you even somewhat criticized him on his management

Quote by Nag "P.S. But at least you're carrying a backup Kicker and Defense on their byes instead of more position players. There's a lesson to be learned here, see if you can figure out what it is."

I was taking a stab at his name when I said "boy", wasn't trying to be vindictive.

Though, the more I re-read over his comments regarding his "mistake", I think the assesment of "boy" actually fits due to his constant whinning and complaining.

I, myself, attempt to not belittle people with my comments as 3INTBOY did toward Tom and Greg....

Quote by 3INTBOY "You cannot be serious, the flex player is locked as a flex? That would be too stupid for the NFFC to have. Everything has been well done, again that would be too stupid. I also do not appreciate having NO REPLY and NO PHONE number to speak with someone in case of a lineup submission problem."

He then went on to compare the NFFC to WCOFF and how they allow the position to be changed after gametime.

TO EVERYONE....The last time I checked, this is the NFFC, not the WCOFF...please quit referring to them when it comes to different things involved in OUR league.

Do you think the people who run Wal-mart want there employees CONSTANTLY referring to what they do at Target?????

I understand Greg and Tom want to appease the masses, but the NFFC doesn't have to be run the same as the WCOFF.

This year I was debating on which to join.....do I want 200k or 100k? Well that's easy to answer!

But then I said, do I want to play in a 12 team league which is easier or a 14 team league which is harder.

Well I am hear so you can see what I chose.

No disrespect to Robert Z, but his results in the WCOFF and this year with us should probably speak volumes as to which competition is the better one.

Again, as usual I have started rambling and got off track....

So Nag, I just wonder why you are sticking up for someone's utter stupidity???

He kept saying, the FLEX position is not a "position".....Well then what is it?

That's like saying a Lincoln is not a vehicle, only Navigator's, Continental's, and Town Car's are vehicles.

That might not be a good analogy, but I think it fits. :confused:

I think I am going to complain too: I picked up Joe Nedney to be my kicker and he is now probably going to be out for the game this week.

He wasn't injured when I picked him up and now he is doubtful, I think I deserve a replacement because I am going to lose out on his points this week! ;) ;) (Please criticize my lack of quality roster management!)
[/QUOTE]That quote about roster management was directed to gekko, not 3intboy.

Flex is not a position. It is an assignment of a position. RB, WR and TEs are p-o-s-i-t-i-o-n-s which can be assigned to a Flex.
For Players. By Players.

User avatar
Diesel
Posts: 5887
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2004 6:00 pm

Would You Consider Kentucky Derby Style In 2006?

Post by Diesel » Sat Nov 26, 2005 1:46 pm

Walla Walla, I can guarantee that it won't be implemented into the Auction format, since who bids first and last has no weight at all. It will most undoubtedly stay random in this format.
*Ranked #1 Average Fantasy Football Player in the Nation 2004-2013

"Fantasy sports are all about LUCK. Except when I win."

dgamblnman
Posts: 307
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 6:00 pm

Would You Consider Kentucky Derby Style In 2006?

Post by dgamblnman » Sat Nov 26, 2005 6:22 pm

By Nag (and others who don't understand)

"Flex is not a position. It is an assignment of a position. RB, WR and TEs are p-o-s-i-t-i-o-n-s which can be assigned to a Flex."

WRONG WRONG WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

RBs, WRs, TEs are P-L-A-Y-E-R-S which may be used the the FLEX P-O-S-I-T-I-O-N

[ November 27, 2005, 12:23 AM: Message edited by: a ]

Walla Walla
Posts: 306
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 6:00 pm

Would You Consider Kentucky Derby Style In 2006?

Post by Walla Walla » Mon Nov 28, 2005 5:52 pm

I have to admit asking about the auction leagues was pretty dumb. LOL! Never let the facts get in the way of a good messege board rant. :D

GOD Loves You
Posts: 2260
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 6:00 pm

Would You Consider Kentucky Derby Style In 2006?

Post by GOD Loves You » Tue Nov 29, 2005 2:59 pm

Originally posted by Nag':
quote:Originally posted by GOD Loves You:
quote:Originally posted by Nag':
quote:Originally posted by GOD Loves You:
And yes 3INTBOY, I, and many others are amazed at your lack of understanding when it came to the flex position. But I guess that should be expected from a "boy" Just an FYI, his "lack of understanding" of the Flex position will result in correction of the software for 2006 season and beyond which will allow players to be assigned & re-assigned as a Flex without being locked in.

Was that expected from a "boy"? :rolleyes:
[/QUOTE]How can you call it a "correction" when that is how it was intended to be?

It's not like there was a glitch and he couldn't make the change.

Nag, you even somewhat criticized him on his management

Quote by Nag "P.S. But at least you're carrying a backup Kicker and Defense on their byes instead of more position players. There's a lesson to be learned here, see if you can figure out what it is."

I was taking a stab at his name when I said "boy", wasn't trying to be vindictive.

Though, the more I re-read over his comments regarding his "mistake", I think the assesment of "boy" actually fits due to his constant whinning and complaining.

I, myself, attempt to not belittle people with my comments as 3INTBOY did toward Tom and Greg....

Quote by 3INTBOY "You cannot be serious, the flex player is locked as a flex? That would be too stupid for the NFFC to have. Everything has been well done, again that would be too stupid. I also do not appreciate having NO REPLY and NO PHONE number to speak with someone in case of a lineup submission problem."

He then went on to compare the NFFC to WCOFF and how they allow the position to be changed after gametime.

TO EVERYONE....The last time I checked, this is the NFFC, not the WCOFF...please quit referring to them when it comes to different things involved in OUR league.

Do you think the people who run Wal-mart want there employees CONSTANTLY referring to what they do at Target?????

I understand Greg and Tom want to appease the masses, but the NFFC doesn't have to be run the same as the WCOFF.

This year I was debating on which to join.....do I want 200k or 100k? Well that's easy to answer!

But then I said, do I want to play in a 12 team league which is easier or a 14 team league which is harder.

Well I am hear so you can see what I chose.

No disrespect to Robert Z, but his results in the WCOFF and this year with us should probably speak volumes as to which competition is the better one.

Again, as usual I have started rambling and got off track....

So Nag, I just wonder why you are sticking up for someone's utter stupidity???

He kept saying, the FLEX position is not a "position".....Well then what is it?

That's like saying a Lincoln is not a vehicle, only Navigator's, Continental's, and Town Car's are vehicles.

That might not be a good analogy, but I think it fits. :confused:

I think I am going to complain too: I picked up Joe Nedney to be my kicker and he is now probably going to be out for the game this week.

He wasn't injured when I picked him up and now he is doubtful, I think I deserve a replacement because I am going to lose out on his points this week! ;) ;) (Please criticize my lack of quality roster management!)
[/QUOTE]That quote about roster management was directed to gekko, not 3intboy.

Flex is not a position. It is an assignment of a position. RB, WR and TEs are p-o-s-i-t-i-o-n-s which can be assigned to a Flex.
[/QUOTE]Sorry Nag, I didn't realize the stab was at Gekko/Connors/Hoffa :D :D

I still don't know how one can argue though, that the FLEX isn't really a position. I understand it isn't a "football position" but c'mon, anyone with brains would realize it locks just as the other "positions"
FAITH IS NOT BELIEVING THAT GOD CAN....
IT IS KNOWING THAT HE WILL

Post Reply