Which stats deserve more fantasy points?

[bill1car]

Take a look at the 8 examples below. In each case, which player deserves more fantasy points?

RB A gains 100 yards rushing
WR B catches 6 passes for 45 yards

RB A gains 80 yards rushing with no turnovers
RB B catches 6 passes for 75 yards with two fumbles lost
RB B catches 6 passes for 50 yards with two fumbles lost (if one point per reception)

RB A gains 100 yards rushing with no turnovers
RB B gains 135 yards with 3 turnovers

QB A throws for 300 yards 2 TD’s and no turnovers
QB B throws for 300 yards 3 TD’s and 5 INT’s (2 of the INT’s returned for TD’s)

K A makes all three 30 yard FG attempts
K B makes 2 50 yd FG’s but misses 3 30 yard FG’s.

D A gives up 9 points, 175 total yards, has one sack and one turnover
D B gives up 45 points, 500 total yards, has 4 sacks and 2 turnovers

WR A runs back punt return for TD
WR B catches one pass for minus 5 yards

D A gives up 18 pts and has 2 safeties
D B gives up 48 points and has 3 sacks and one turnover

In all 8 examples B receives more fantasy points than A under current NFFC rules.

[TR]

Good post...yep I can live with your 1st and 5th examples but the rest make absolute no sense and cheapen things imo...dunno why Primetime felt the need to copy wcoff and go to full PPR for RBs when 1/2 PPR was more than fair.