N F L Schedule

williamhare · Post by **williamhare** » Tue Apr 10, 2007 7:50 am

Just an FYI-

This will be released tomorrow (Wed. 4/11)
at 1pm EST on both NFL Network and NFL.com.
Hman83

BillyWaz · Post by **BillyWaz** » Tue Apr 10, 2007 9:57 am

Gentlemen.........

"Start your boners!"

P.S You too Jules!

Purple Helmets · Post by **Purple Helmets** » Tue Apr 10, 2007 1:36 pm

Originally posted by BillyWaz:
Gentlemen.........

"Start your boners!"

P.S You too Jules!

Classic...even before the Jules comment. Thanks for the laugh.

spook · Post by **spook** » Tue Apr 10, 2007 6:19 pm

"Boing"

Route Collectors · Post by **Route Collectors** » Wed Apr 11, 2007 7:41 am

Man it's nice to finally have something strategic to look at. For starters... Saints play all FF playoff games in domes (2 at home).

Tom Kessenich · Post by **Tom Kessenich** » Wed Apr 11, 2007 7:46 am

Packers' schedule is brutal. I could see them losing at least 6 road games and maybe all 8. On the flip side, the home schedule isn't too demanding. But that road schedule really is a killer.

slam · Post by **slam** » Thu Apr 12, 2007 10:40 am

The GB home schedule is not too demanding? Is this sarcasm Tom?

They start with PHIL, SD and CHI....thats three losses.
Figure on CAR giving them a hard time and they are 4-4 at best at home. Coupled with a terrible road schedule (2-6 if lucky) and the pack is looking at 6-10 this year.

Tom Kessenich · Post by **Tom Kessenich** » Thu Apr 12, 2007 10:45 am

Not sarcasm. Yes those are three tough games. I think they can beat Carolina (who I like to bounce back) at home. And Minnesota and Detroit both stink so they should win those games. They also get Oakland and Washington at home. I could see them splitting with the Bears (they split with them last season) and that's 6-2 at home. Figure 2-6 on the road and I think an 8-8 record is a likely scenario.

bald is beautiful · Post by **bald is beautiful** » Thu Apr 12, 2007 10:53 am

They split with the Bears because the Bears did not give a rat's behind in that last game. When it meant something - the first game - they got their arse handed to 'em.

Tom Kessenich · Post by **Tom Kessenich** » Thu Apr 12, 2007 10:54 am

Originally posted by bald is beautiful:
They split with the Bears because the Bears did not give a rat's behind in that last game. When it meant something - the first game - they got their arse handed to 'em. The Bears played their regulars in that game. They were trying to win. But Grossman was so absolutely pathetic the Bears had no chance. As long as Grossman remains the QB, the Bears will always be on shaky ground.