Wednesday Chat

Tom Kessenich · Post by **Tom Kessenich** » Wed Aug 24, 2005 7:00 am

OK folks plenty to talk about today. Again, we may have two openings left in Thursday's final $100 Satellite League so if you're interested get in touch with Greg or myself today. We're also inching our way closer to Sunday's end of registration, so if we have any fence-sitters -- and I know there are some of you out there -- your time's running out to join us in Vegas, NY or Chicago. It's going to be big fun so c'mon out and join us.

And now let's chat. Bring your questions, comments and let's have some fun.

TradeStar28 · Post by **TradeStar28** » Wed Aug 24, 2005 7:26 am

Tom...is their anyway to access the Satellite league's draft results through the mockdraftcentral website?

Tom Kessenich · Post by **Tom Kessenich** » Wed Aug 24, 2005 7:32 am

Only for the ones you were entered in.

TradeStar28 · Post by **TradeStar28** » Wed Aug 24, 2005 7:39 am

Originally posted by Tom Kessenich:
Only for the ones you were entered in. Anyway you can change that so we can all see the Satellite drafts?

Tom Kessenich · Post by **Tom Kessenich** » Wed Aug 24, 2005 7:41 am

Originally posted by FI$HER:
quote:Originally posted by Tom Kessenich:
Only for the ones you were entered in. Anyway you can change that so we can all see the Satellite drafts?

[/QUOTE]We'll look into it.

As far as my Top 8 I'd rank them as follow:

Taylor
Arrington
R.Brown
Foster
Barlow
C.Brown
Bennett
Henry

Dyv · Post by **Dyv** » Wed Aug 24, 2005 8:02 am

Fisher the reason you aren't able to access the mocks is that it would be unfair to competitors for someone to 'get a book' on someone just because they are playing in these early drafts. I realize it would be beneficial for you to get ADP and other information, but I would be strongly opposed to this data being accessed by others I might compete against. Pay $100 and check it out

Dave

Tom Kessenich · Post by **Tom Kessenich** » Wed Aug 24, 2005 8:08 am

We need a few more sign-ups Glenn. Have a little more patience.

I like Clayton and Williams more than Fitz and it's a tough call between the two of them. I give a slight edge to Clayton because he really doesn't have any other standout threats to take receptions away whereas Williams has at least one (Rogers) and possibly two (Mike Williams).

Dyv · Post by **Dyv** » Wed Aug 24, 2005 8:10 am

Tom, how about that Thursday satellite - can we draw names there? I already know you're going to give me #11-13 so it's no particular 'wait' on my part

[ August 24, 2005, 02:10 PM: Message edited by: Dyv ]