Give Us Some Feedback On The Live Drafts

pizzatyme
Posts: 3528
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:00 pm

Give Us Some Feedback On The Live Drafts

Post by pizzatyme » Sun Sep 27, 2009 1:00 am

Some people pony up the cash to go to the Super Bowl. Others stay home and watch it on TV. It's the same game either way.

The experience is different for sure.
2008- Didn't finish last overall in the Classic.
2009- Didn't finish last overall in the Classic or Primetime.

Gordon Gekko II
Posts: 647
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 6:00 pm

Give Us Some Feedback On The Live Drafts

Post by Gordon Gekko II » Sun Sep 27, 2009 2:25 am

Originally posted by King of Queens:
Here's a better way to look at it:

2010 NFFC Classic
Entry Fee: $1500
Attend our live drafts** and receive a $100 discount!
as usual, KoQ is AHEAD of the curve!

if anyone has seen how much the online leagues have grown in the NFBC/NFFC main events, you have to wonder if sooner rather than later, half of all main event participants are going to be online. the draft day experience will become less thrilling...

[ September 27, 2009, 08:26 AM: Message edited by: Gordon Gekko II ]

Raiders
Posts: 3285
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 6:00 pm

Give Us Some Feedback On The Live Drafts

Post by Raiders » Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:18 am

East St. Louis. Yep that went well for FFOC. :D

pizzatyme
Posts: 3528
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:00 pm

Give Us Some Feedback On The Live Drafts

Post by pizzatyme » Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am

Originally posted by Gordon Gekko II:
quote:Originally posted by King of Queens:
Here's a better way to look at it:

2010 NFFC Classic
Entry Fee: $1500
Attend our live drafts** and receive a $100 discount!
as usual, KoQ is AHEAD of the curve!

if anyone has seen how much the online leagues have grown in the NFBC/NFFC main events, you have to wonder if sooner rather than later, half of all main event participants are going to be online. the draft day experience will become less thrilling...
[/QUOTE]While I'm sure the ownership wants everyone to enjoy themselves, I believe their first priority is making the event profitable.

If it were 70/30 towards online, then so be it. That says the majority would prefer to curb costs, increase ROI, etc.

Why should online drafters pay for our live draft experience? Makes zero sense to me.
2008- Didn't finish last overall in the Classic.
2009- Didn't finish last overall in the Classic or Primetime.

Raiders
Posts: 3285
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 6:00 pm

Give Us Some Feedback On The Live Drafts

Post by Raiders » Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:34 am

Originally posted by Just Russ:
quote:Originally posted by Gordon Gekko II:
quote:Originally posted by King of Queens:
Here's a better way to look at it:

2010 NFFC Classic
Entry Fee: $1500
Attend our live drafts** and receive a $100 discount!
as usual, KoQ is AHEAD of the curve!

if anyone has seen how much the online leagues have grown in the NFBC/NFFC main events, you have to wonder if sooner rather than later, half of all main event participants are going to be online. the draft day experience will become less thrilling...
[/QUOTE]While I'm sure the ownership wants everyone to enjoy themselves, I believe their first priority is making the event profitable.

If it were 70/30 towards online, then so be it. That says the majority would prefer to curb costs, increase ROI, etc.

Why should online drafters pay for our live draft experience? Makes zero sense to me.
[/QUOTE]GG KOQ

Let me have the first shot. :D

Russ,

When building a Contest you want people to 'Come to your event to Draft' make it frist class and there hooked. Drafting from home(online) is not going to hook anyone.

How was that? ;)

John

User avatar
Glenneration X
Posts: 1704
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 6:00 pm
Location: Long Island, NY

Give Us Some Feedback On The Live Drafts

Post by Glenneration X » Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:50 am

Originally posted by Raiders:
East St. Louis. Yep that went well for FFOC. :D Their live draft was a flop?

Gordon Gekko II
Posts: 647
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 6:00 pm

Give Us Some Feedback On The Live Drafts

Post by Gordon Gekko II » Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:52 am

Originally posted by Just Russ:
If it were 70/30 towards online, then so be it. That says the majority would prefer to curb costs, increase ROI, etc.
if it were 70/30 in favor of online,THERE WOULD BE NO LIVE EVENTS AND THIS TURNS INTO JUST AN INTERNET LEAGUE.

pizzatyme
Posts: 3528
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:00 pm

Give Us Some Feedback On The Live Drafts

Post by pizzatyme » Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:53 am

Seems like the Online Championship did okay this year?

Yes, it was a lower entry fee, but they also had to lower the Primetime EF to keep participation up. IMO.

This is my 3rd year and it sure as hell isn't because of the live draft experiences I had in Tampa and Orlando. Just saying.

I participated in a regional event that had 9 12-team leagues. It was easily more enjoyable than my other "awesome" draft experiences.

I think this discussion could be easily concluded if you just ask the phone/online drafters if they're willing to pay an extra $100 so the live drafters can have a nice buffet. ;)
2008- Didn't finish last overall in the Classic.
2009- Didn't finish last overall in the Classic or Primetime.

Gordon Gekko II
Posts: 647
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 6:00 pm

Give Us Some Feedback On The Live Drafts

Post by Gordon Gekko II » Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:53 am

I'm curious to know what the Zoot clan feels about all of this. Can one of you comment?

Hard heads
Posts: 938
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 6:00 pm

Give Us Some Feedback On The Live Drafts

Post by Hard heads » Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:58 am

Russ I understand your points, but I was only responding to the idea where Greg said he wants to continue to make it an event while growing. While discouraging people from doing the phone leagues would help to make it an event, it may discourage overall growth by forcing people to look for alternatives. Oh and btw, comparing this to watching the Superbowl live or traveling to see it is just that, not a comparison. Anyway, carry on.... :D

Post Reply